Case study — Public sector

Grants to the right people in minutes — not the fraudsters.

A government body paying out grants and subsidies was losing public money to false and duplicate claims — while honest citizens and businesses waited months for money they were owed. We caught the fraud and freed the queue.

ClientAn Israeli public-sector (government) body
RemitGrants, subsidies & public support
The workCross-agency data, anomaly detection, green-lane automation
OutcomeFraud losses −~50% · approvals weeks → minutes
The problem

Public money out the wrong door.

A public body handing out grants, subsidies and support was losing a large amount of public money to false claims, duplicate requests and bad actors exploiting bureaucratic gaps.

And the manual defence punished everyone else. Reviewers went through thousands of forms, payslips and scanned documents by hand every day; the Sisyphean workload created backlogs of months, holding up money for citizens and businesses who were genuinely entitled to it. The old rules-based system threw a false alarm at every small anomaly, blocking legitimate requests and piling impossible load onto the service and appeals desks. Fraud got through; the honest waited.

What we did

Check every claim in seconds, with the reason attached.

Cross-reference in real time, auto-pay the clean, and hand a human the doubtful ones with the evidence.

Data

A secure cross-agency pipeline

We built a secured data infrastructure that cross-references an applicant's details in real time against government databases, reporting history and existing records — the full picture, at the moment of the request.

Detect

Anomalies & forgeries

An engine scans every incoming document and form in seconds, spotting complex fraud patterns — documents edited in an image editor, or a ring of applicants filing from the same IP address — and screens them out.

Green lane

Clean claims pay themselves

Valid requests above a 95% certainty bar are approved and passed to payment automatically, with no human touch — the entitled citizen stops waiting behind everyone else's suspicion.

Triage

Humans on the suspicious ones

Doubtful cases go to a human investigator with a "red summary" that points precisely at the contradiction in the data — a lead to work, not a blank form to re-read.

Fewer false alarms

Only real risk gets raised

Scoring on genuine signals rather than blanket rules dried up the flood of false positives that used to block legitimate applicants and swamp the appeals desk.

Accountable

Every decision explainable

Because each flag carries its evidence and each auto-approval its score, decisions on public money can be inspected and defended — essential in the public sector.

The result

Less lost, faster paid.

Catching more fraud and paying honest citizens faster stopped being a trade-off.

Live

Fraud losses down ~50%, approvals in minutes

Losses paid out on fraudulent claims fell by around 50% in the first quarter, and the time to approve support for a legitimate citizen dropped from several weeks to a few minutes — a real lift in public trust.

And the team

80% fewer false alarms

Four in five false-alarm alerts were eliminated, letting a small control team focus entirely on investigating genuine attempts to defraud the public purse instead of clearing innocent applicants.

Why it holds

Fast, fair, and on the record.

It holds because it only auto-pays where it's near-certain and cheap to be wrong, and every escalation carries the evidence a human needs to decide and to justify — which is exactly what accountability for public money demands. Automation on the clear cases, a person and a paper trail on the rest — the same discipline behind our fraud-detection work for a private insurer.

Losing public funds while citizens wait?

Book a strategy call Blanket rules punish the honest and miss the clever. Thirty minutes, no slides — or see more case studies.