The problem

The firm's scarcest resource went on housekeeping.

Coordinating a single external meeting turned into a long back-and-forth of proposed slots, clashes and reschedules, the kind of calendar tetris that quietly consumed hours of senior time every week and produced nothing but a booked room.

The meetings themselves leaked value. In busy board and steering sessions no one owned the record, so decisions rested on people's memory, and by the following week the firm was relitigating things it had already settled.

And nothing chased the work. Action items were handed out in the room and then left to fend for themselves, with no active follow-up, so cross-organisation projects stalled on tasks that everyone assumed someone else was tracking.

What we did

Give every leader an assistant that actually does the work.

One agent that books the meeting, records the decision, and opens the task, with a person always able to step in.

Email-native scheduling

It negotiates the time for you

The leader copies the agent onto an email, and it negotiates a slot in natural language directly with the external parties, handling clashes and reschedules until a time is agreed, then sends the invites, no assistant in the middle.

Virtual participant

In every call, taking the notes

The agent joins each video and phone meeting as a participant, transcribes the whole conversation, tells the speakers apart, and turns it into a tight executive summary the moment the meeting ends.

Action items to tickets

Commitments become tracked work

It reads the transcript, extracts each participant's commitments, and opens tickets in the firm's project system with owners and due dates, so what was promised in the room exists as tracked work by the time people leave it.

Automatic follow-up

It chases the late tasks

When a due date slips, the agent follows up with the owner automatically, which is the part a human assistant rarely has time for and the reason tasks used to quietly die between meetings.

Person in control

Draft, review, approve

Summaries and proposed times surface for the leader to adjust or approve, so the agent runs the admin at speed while a human keeps final say over anything that leaves the building.

Discretion by design

Sensitive meetings stay sensitive

The agent handles confidential board and investment discussions under strict access rules, so the convenience never comes at the cost of who can see what was said.

The result

The admin disappeared, and the work moved faster.

Hours back for every leader, a record for every meeting, and projects that no longer stall.

Live

About six hours a week, back per leader

Coordinating meetings stopped being a human job, which handed each partner and senior leader roughly six hours a week back. Every meeting now ends with an accurate official summary circulated in under five minutes, with no one typing it up.

And faster

Delivery up around 30%

Because the system opens the tasks and chases the ones running late, cross-organisation projects moved about 30% faster, and the firm got the alignment it used to hope for: everyone leaving a meeting with the same record of what was decided.

Why it holds

An agent earns trust by closing the loop, not just talking.

A meeting assistant that only summarises is a nicety; the value is in the agent that also books the time, opens the ticket and chases the owner, then hands a person the final say. It is the same close-the-loop discipline behind our agentic-automation work, aimed at the executive calendar rather than the service desk.

More case studies

Related work.

How many senior hours go on the calendar?

Book a strategy call Bring the diaries no one can tame. Thirty minutes, no slides, or explore AI for professional services, or see more case studies.