Case study — Media · Subscriptions

We saw them leaving 30 days before the cancel call.

A large Israeli content provider was losing thousands of paying subscribers every month, and no one could see it coming. We moved retention from firefighting after the cancellation to a quiet, personal nudge weeks before it.

ClientA well-known Israeli content & media provider
ScaleHundreds of thousands of subscribers
The workBehavioural data, churn prediction, automated retention
OutcomeMonthly churn −~25% · usage +40%
The problem

Losing customers, blind to it.

A large content and broadcast business was losing thousands of paying subscribers a month — and no one in management could say in advance who was about to leave, or why.

So retention happened after the flood: marketing burned huge budgets on blanket campaigns and sweeping offers, but only once a customer had already phoned in to cancel. And the vast content library worked against them — with no way to recommend the right thing at the right moment, subscribers drifted into non-use and the feeling that they weren't getting their money's worth. The data to see it coming existed; nothing was reading it.

What we did

We read the warning signs early.

Catch the drift weeks ahead, then act on it — personally, automatically, before the phone rings.

Data

A behavioural pipeline

We joined the app and online usage data — who watched what, where they stopped, how often they logged in each week — with the older billing and service-centre systems, into one live view of each subscriber.

Prediction

Early warning, 30 days out

A model that reads behaviour patterns and spots a subscriber losing interest — a gradual drop in watch time over a fortnight, say — roughly 30 days before they even think about cancelling.

Recommend

The right thing to watch

Instead of a giant, unnavigable library, the system surfaces content matched to each person's taste at the moment it matters — turning drift back into use, which is the real cure for churn.

Retain

A targeted save, automatically

Rather than nagging with generic texts, the system sends an at-risk subscriber a tailored content suggestion, or triggers a precise price offer — the intervention most likely to keep that particular person.

Personal

One subscriber at a time

Every save is built from that subscriber's own behaviour, not a segment average — so the nudge feels like the service understanding them, not a mass mailshot.

Proactive

Ahead of the cancellation

The whole loop runs before the customer decides to leave, which is the only point at which retention is cheap — and quiet, instead of a call-centre scramble.

The result

Fewer leaving, more watching.

Retention stopped being a monthly emergency and became a background process.

Live

Monthly churn down ~25%

The monthly churn rate fell by around 25% in the first quarter alone, and average watch time and usage per subscriber rose 40% on the back of smarter, more precise content recommendations.

And the budget

From firefighting to quiet

The service centre's retention spend dropped sharply as it moved from putting out fires — expensive last-minute saves — to calm, proactive retention that happens before anyone reaches for the cancel button.

Why it holds

Retention that runs itself.

It lasts because it's early and personal: the model watches the leading signals rather than the lagging cancellation, and every save is fitted to the individual, so the intervention lands instead of annoying. Prediction wired to an automatic, tailored action — that's the difference between knowing your churn number and actually moving it. It's the same production discipline behind our operational-assistant work.

Finding out they left only when they've left?

Book a strategy call The signals are in your usage data weeks ahead. Thirty minutes, no slides — or see more case studies.